{"id":308,"date":"2013-03-02T13:31:15","date_gmt":"2013-03-02T18:31:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/?p=308"},"modified":"2021-02-14T18:16:09","modified_gmt":"2021-02-14T23:16:09","slug":"notable-claude-rains-pictures-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/?p=308","title":{"rendered":"Notable Claude Rains Pictures (Part II)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Notorious<\/h1>\n<div id=\"attachment_361\" style=\"width: 1930px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-361\" class=\"size-full wp-image-361\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?resize=625%2C352\" alt=\"Claude Rains in 'Notorious':  The Nazi mama's boy.\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?w=1920 1920w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?resize=300%2C168 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?resize=1024%2C576 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?resize=624%2C351 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-02.jpg?w=1250 1250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-361\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Claude Rains in &#8216;Notorious&#8217;: The Nazi mama&#8217;s boy.<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>Alex Sebastian in \u201cNotorious\u201d (RKO, 1946) is one of Claude Rains\u2019 best parts.\u00a0 As Sebastian, Rains\u2019 performance is so indelible that once you\u2019ve seen it, it\u2019s hard to imagine another actor in the role.\u00a0 After \u201cNotorious,\u201d whenever a picture called for a silky, suave villain, producers would tell the casting agent:\u00a0 \u201cget me a Claude Rains type.\u201d\u00a0 Rains was not, however, Hitchcock\u2019s first choice.\u00a0 Hitch wanted that poor man\u2019s George Sanders, Clifton Webb.\u00a0 To be sure, Webb would have been entirely convincing as a mama\u2019s boy (which he was). He was, moreover, such an unsympathetic screen presence, one would be glad to believe he was also a Nazi.\u00a0 But as a heterosexual in the grip of an obsessive sexual passion for Ingrid Bergman . . . not bloody likely.\u00a0 One can easily imagine his putting clothes <i>on<\/i> Ingrid Bergman, but not his tearing them <i>off<\/i>. \u00a0Hitchcock had to be convinced to let Rains play the role.\u00a0 When he talked to Rains about the part, Hitch asked him, \u201cWhat about this business of a being a midget?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat do you mean, a midget?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYour wife, Ingrid Bergman, is very tall.\u00a0 There are occasions when we can build a ramp, but have you ever worn elevated shoes?\u201d\u00a0 It was a blow to Rains\u2019 pride, but he bought the lifts and often used them throughout the rest of his career.<\/p>\n<p>When critics refer to Sebastian as a Nazi mama\u2019s boy, there\u2019s always the sense that they find his being a mama\u2019s boy somehow more objectionable than his being a Nazi.\u00a0 The other famous Hitchcock mama\u2019s boy is also a villain:\u00a0 Norman Bates.\u00a0 In that one, Bates\u2019 villainy only comes out when he actually IS his mama.\u00a0 I\u2019m not sure what to make of this, other than Hitch was a strange fellow.<\/p>\n<p>Bergman isn\u2019t good in the first reel, when we\u2019re supposed to believe she\u2019s a hard-drinking tramp, but after the first dozen or so minutes, I\u2019d say it\u2019s the best performance of her career.\u00a0 Cary Grant, for once, doesn\u2019t twinkle and make coy faces, but he goes too far in the other direction:\u00a0 he\u2019s so brutal and unyielding, it\u2019s hard to understand why Bergman puts up with him.\u00a0 He is very good looking and beautifully dressed, but what a swine . . .\u00a0 I keep thinking she\u2019d be better off with Rains, if only he weren\u2019t trying to kill her.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_360\" style=\"width: 1610px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-360\" class=\"size-full wp-image-360\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?resize=625%2C461\" alt=\"Rains, Grant, Bergman:  'We both invited you, Mr Devlin.'\" width=\"625\" height=\"461\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?w=1600 1600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?resize=300%2C221 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?resize=1024%2C754 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?resize=624%2C459 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-01.jpg?w=1250 1250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-360\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Rains, Grant, Bergman: &#8216;We <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">both<\/span> invited you, Mr Devlin.&#8217;<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>The most famous scene in the picture is the big party and the furtive investigation of the wine cellar \u2014 it\u2019s Hitchcock at his absolute best.\u00a0 But my favorite scene happens the morning after, when Sebastian in robe and slippers goes into his mother\u2019s (Madame Konstantin) bedroom and tells her that he is in big trouble.\u00a0 \u201cI am married to an American agent,\u201d a memorable line reading that belongs (but isn\u2019t) on the AFI\u2019s 100 Movie Quotes list.\u00a0 Mme. Konstantin responds by lighting a cigarette while she absorbs the news in silence.\u00a0 It doesn\u2019t take more than five seconds, but it\u2019s a Master Class in great acting.\u00a0 She conveys more about her character in those few seconds of silence than most actresses could convey in a hundred lines of dialogue.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_362\" style=\"width: 833px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-362\" class=\"size-full wp-image-362\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg?resize=625%2C835\" alt=\"Rains, Mme. Konstantin:  'I am married to an American agent.'\" width=\"625\" height=\"835\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg?w=823 823w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg?resize=224%2C300 224w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg?resize=766%2C1024 766w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Notorious-03.jpg?resize=624%2C834 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-362\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Rains, Mme. Konstantin: &#8216;I am married to an American agent.&#8217;<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>But it is Rains\u2019 performance that makes the deepest impression.\u00a0 As usual, he dominates every scene he\u2019s in.\u00a0 He makes the Nazi mama\u2019s boy a more sympathetic character than Cary Grant\u2019s hero.\u00a0 It was his fourth and last Academy Award nomination.\u00a0 He didn\u2019t win this time, either.\u00a0 For this was the year that Clifton Webb was supposed to win for \u201cThe Razor\u2019s Edge,\u201d only to lose out (along with Rains) to Harold Russell in \u201cThe Best Years of our Lives.\u201d<\/p>\n<h1>Now, Voyager<\/h1>\n<div id=\"attachment_335\" style=\"width: 820px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-01.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-335\" class=\"size-full wp-image-335\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-01.jpg?resize=625%2C478\" alt=\"Davis to Rains:  'I should think you're the least clumsy man I ever met, doctor . . .'\" width=\"625\" height=\"478\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-01.jpg?w=810 810w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-01.jpg?resize=300%2C229 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-01.jpg?resize=624%2C477 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-335\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Oh, Doctor! \u00a0Rains: &#8216;I have a great admiration for people who are clever with their hands. \u00a0I was always so clumsy with my own.&#8217; \u00a0Davis: \u00a0&#8216;I should think you&#8217;re the least clumsy person I ever met . . .&#8217;<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>About &#8220;Now, Voyager.&#8221; Its failings are many, but I continue to love it, probably because I&#8217;ve always gotten deep satisfaction from transformation stories. The first and final scenes are wonderful, but in the middle there is much to dislike.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an important early scene, in which Rains, as Dr Jacquith, America&#8217;s foremost alienist, does what he does better than anyone else. \u00a0The material is entirely second-rate, composed almost entirely of platitudes, but he makes it sound like the last word in compassionate sagacity. \u00a0His closing line, &#8220;I suggest a few weeks at Cascade . . . &#8221; lets you know that poor, crazy Aunt Charlotte will emerge from Dr Jacquith&#8217;s sanitarium as a butterfly from a chrysalis.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/mkgN5kBSdKo?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Now, Voyager&#8221; works just about perfectly for the first forty-five minutes or so, until Charlotte Vale (Bette Davis) and Jerry Durrance (Paul Henreid) take that taxicab in Rio, driven by that stereotypical (but completely inaccurate) greaseball, Giuseppe. (He&#8217;s supposed to be Brazilian, but he&#8217;s named Giuseppe and his cartoon gibberish sounds nothing like Portuguese.) The taxicab scene is tiresome and offensive and goes on forever. Happily, it is followed by several wonderful episodes, beginning with their romantic parting in Rio, which is beautifully written and acted. The scenes immediately following Charlotte&#8217;s homecoming are the best in the picture: Gladys Cooper fully expects her neurotic child to return to enslavement without a murmur of protest; she is seriously displeased when the wretched girl mildly refuses to do as she&#8217;s told. Cooper rebukes her for refusing to perform a daughter&#8217;s duty, but Charlotte dryly observes, &#8220;Dr Jacquith says tyranny is often expressed as the maternal instinct.&#8221; Cooper&#8217;s surprise and outrage are wonderful to behold. Every new encounter becomes a skirmish in which the old woman pursues a new strategy, but the girl treats chastisement and obloquy as if they were birthday greetings, and Cooper must quickly beat a retreat while she gives the matter more thought. Finally, she threatens to cut off Charlotte&#8217;s allowance completely and to disinherit her: but the ungrateful girl blandly tells her &#8220;I&#8217;ve often thought of working for a living. I&#8217;d make an excellent headwaitress.&#8221; Over the course of these episodes, the old tyrant slowly comes to realize that this stubborn female person is no longer her neurotic daughter\/servant Charlotte: this person is Bette Davis &#8212; obedience isn&#8217;t what she does. I love every scene with Gladys Cooper, but when the old cat finally drops dead and the guilt-ridden Charlotte runs back to Cascade, the picture hits another patch of tedium while Charlotte finds herself looking after young Miss Tina Durrance, the most insufferable little neurotic in the history of motion pictures. Let me point out at once that the little actress is actually quite terrific: it is the character who is so revolting. At least, until Charlotte takes charge of her.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered about the theory of treatment at Cascade(s): I mean, who in his right mind would believe it a good idea to force a nervous wreck like Tina to compete at ping pong with children who are far more skillful than she, especially\u00a0if they are equally neurotic? That strikes me as a sure way to push her over the edge. But then Charlotte steps in. Something marvellous happens when the ugly little duckling comes under Charlotte&#8217;s care. Earlier in the picture, Charlotte herself had gone from ugly duckling to swan. Now she transforms her by-proxy daughter from ugly duckling to . . . ugly duckling with cleaner fingernails and an expensive party dress. \u00a0For a long time, that threw me. \u00a0Whenever I saw homely, awkward little Tina descending the stairs in her ribbons and ruffles, I thought of those lines from &#8220;Don&#8217;t Put Your Daughter on the Stage, Mrs Worthington&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">She&#8217;s a vile girl and uglier than mortal sin,<br \/>\nOne look at her has put me in<br \/>\nA tearing bloody rage.<\/p>\n<p>But then I noticed how beautifully the child actress, Janis Wilson, handled the scene. All dressed up, she&#8217;s still not pretty and she knows it. She&#8217;s awkward and self-conscious and pathetic. But she&#8217;s doing her best to look poised, confident and pretty, because she wants to please Charlotte and her father. It&#8217;s an amazing little performance.<\/p>\n<p>Moments before this, Claude Rains has asked the immortal question, &#8220;Roasting wienies?!&#8221; Quite irresistible!<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ywHzqSv-Pp4?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p>It was wise to cast Claude Rains as Dr Jaquith, because Dr J, as written, may be the worst alienist who ever drew breath. \u00a0Rains soft pedals the terrible advice and lays on the creamy charm with a large trowel. \u00a0&#8220;You&#8217;ll never get a new pair of eyes if you spoil them with tears,&#8221; is some of the first quackery we hear from him and there&#8217;s plenty more to follow. \u00a0I mention this because Olive Higgins Prouty, the author of the novel, had a long acquaintance with psychiatrists. \u00a0When she was twelve, she suffered a breakdown that lasted nearly two years. \u00a0Later on, when she was a successful novelist, she became a philanthropist and gave an endowment to Smith College, where she first met Sylvia Plath. \u00a0After Plath&#8217;s failed suicide attempt, Prouty supported her financially. \u00a0To show her gratitude, Plath caricatured her in &#8220;The Bell Jar.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_337\" style=\"width: 635px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-03.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-337\" class=\"size-full wp-image-337\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-03.jpg?w=625\" alt=\"Cooper:  'Charlotte, I thought I told you to wear the black &amp; white foulard.'\"   srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-03.jpg?w=328 328w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-03.jpg?resize=240%2C300 240w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 328px) 100vw, 328px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-337\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Cooper: &#8216;Charlotte, I thought I told you to wear the black and white foulard.&#8217;<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>Keep a look out for what Gladys Cooper does with her hands. She uses them to great effect in a few important scenes. \u00a0I&#8217;ve always admired her technical skill, especially\u00a0since she wasn&#8217;t, alas, a great actress. I love the way the camera focuses on Cooper&#8217;s fingers drumming on the bedpost while she listens to Charlotte&#8217;s disobedience. That may be the best thing she ever did in pictures. She was <em>une grande dame par excellence<\/em> and a thorough professional, but she wasn&#8217;t imaginative or talented enough to be great. Her voice wasn&#8217;t terribly interesting or expressive, though I am CRAZY in love with her old-fashioned pronunciation. She provides a window into Edwardian pronunciation: for instance, she&#8217;s the only person I&#8217;ve ever heard pronounce &#8220;secretiveness&#8221; as seCREETiveness. In another picture, she&#8217;s the only one to pronounce the last name &#8220;Cartwright&#8221; as KHAR-tritt. Both pronunciations are clearly (at least to me) not her own invention, but fossils from Edwardian, perhaps even Victorian RP (i.e., &#8220;received pronunciation&#8221; &#8212; you may already know that acronym, but it was new to me as of about a year ago). Gladys Cooper didn&#8217;t have the imagination to come up with eccentric pronunciations. Such eccentricities as she possessed were not eccentricities at her career&#8217;s beginning, when she was universally considered to be the most beautiful woman in England (circa 1905 &#8211; 1925). The British postcard industry was invented almost entirely so that her face could be printed and mailed about the country and all over the world. She was a good, sensible actress, but hardly a great one. Bette Davis loved her, really adored and admired her. When Davis made her memorable appearance on the Dick Cavett Show in 1971, it was the day after Cooper died. Davis paid a brilliant, moving tribute to Gladys Cooper . . . so moving, in fact, that I hunted down Sheridan Morley&#8217;s biography of Cooper, which I read, and also had a look at as many of her movie performances as I could find. She never, ever gave a bad performance, but she rarely did anything terribly imaginative. She simply wasn&#8217;t that clever. That&#8217;s why her hands in &#8220;Now, Voyager&#8221; mean something to me. She communicates anxiety and frustration with them in a way that neither her voice nor her face were capable of. I like to think that Cooper rose to the occasion of working with a great actress like Bette Davis and a great actor like Claude Rains (whom she knew from her theatre days in London &#8212; by the way, she was the first living actress in England to have a theatre named after her). But I&#8217;m afraid this is sentimental fantasy on my part. She had no use for ugly actors and certainly recognized and deplored incompetent actors. But I doubt she recognized Davis&#8217; and Rains&#8217; greatness &#8212; certainly not fully. Davis&#8217; adoration was almost certainly one-sided: Cooper doubtless thought Davis&#8217; admiration was simply an indication of common sense.<\/p>\n<p>John Gielgud told a funny story about the time he attempted to direct the aging Mrs Patrick Campbell (Shaw&#8217;s first Eliza Doolittle) in a West End play in the early 30s. Mrs Pat abruptly quit the show shortly before opening night, because she wanted to spend more time with her dogs. But before she did this, she raised hell at every rehearsal, one way or another. Though the play was perfectly straight-forward, Mrs Pat was (or pretended to be) in a constant state of irritable bewilderment. She interrupted one run-through by demanding, &#8220;Who <em>are<\/em> these people? Where do they <em>come<\/em> from? Does Gladys Cooper know them?&#8221; Cooper was not a great actress, but she most definitely had been a very great star for a very long time. Adoration was what she expected. In Hollywood, it was not always what she got.<\/p>\n<p>Irving Rapper, the director, was a Warners&#8217; workhorse &#8212; not particularly distinguished, but competent. He did a lot of apprentice work as dialogue director on pictures like &#8220;The Adventures of Robin Hood,&#8221; &#8220;Dark Victory,&#8221; &#8220;Juarez&#8221; and &#8220;All This, and Heaven Too.&#8221; The look, I&#8217;d suggest, is more the work of the Director of Photography, Sol Polito, who did a lot of excellent work in his career, including &#8220;The Adventures of Robin Hood,&#8221; &#8220;Old Acquaintance&#8221; and several other Davis and Flynn pictures. Still, Rapper must have had a lot to say about it, especially\u00a0since &#8220;Deception,&#8221; photographed by another great DP (Ernest Haller &#8212; one of Davis&#8217; favorites: e.g., &#8220;Jezebel,&#8221; &#8220;Dark Victory,&#8221; &#8220;All This, and Heaven Too&#8221;), is notable for how great it looks. But part of the great look was the Warners&#8217; style, which I find irresistible, even in many of their cruddier pictures. I can almost always tell a Warners picture within a few minutes.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_339\" style=\"width: 457px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-04.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-339\" class=\"size-full wp-image-339\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-04.jpg?resize=447%2C353\" alt=\"Davis:  'Oh, Jerry, don't let's ask for the moon . . . we have the stars.'\" width=\"447\" height=\"353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-04.jpg?w=447 447w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Now-Voyager-04.jpg?resize=300%2C236 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 447px) 100vw, 447px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-339\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Davis: &#8216;Oh, Jerry, don&#8217;t let&#8217;s ask for the moon . . . we have the stars.&#8217;<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>For my money, &#8220;Now, Voyager&#8221; is one of Max Steiner&#8217;s best scores, specifically because it adds romance without being intrusive. &#8220;Oh, Jerry, don&#8217;t let&#8217;s ask for the moon: we have the stars.&#8221; is a beauty of a last line, and it is greatly helped by the underscoring. Steiner adds musicality to Davis&#8217; voice that wasn&#8217;t there without music. His other great score is the one he wrote for &#8220;Casablanca,&#8221; which I consider to be the absolute model of great scoring. There&#8217;s one important musical cue in that picture &#8212; the underscoring for the Paris montage sequence &#8212; variations on &#8220;As Time Goes By&#8221; &#8212; that I swear is responsible for making audiences (including me) accept the picture as a great, gorgeous romance rather than a story of an attractive, somewhat bovine young woman and a middle-aged man in a partial toupee, with cigarettes and bourbon staining his false teeth and befouling his breath. There are a hundred things right with &#8220;Casablanca&#8221;; it&#8217;s one of my favorite pictures (though I don&#8217;t consider it a great one), and up at the top of the list is Steiner&#8217;s score, which is very nearly invisible to the ear, but creates atmosphere every bit as effectively and persuasively as the fog and rain in the last scene and the rotating blades of the ceiling fans in Rick&#8217;s Caf\u00e9 Americain.<\/p>\n<h1>The Passionate Friends<\/h1>\n<div id=\"attachment_313\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-05.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-313\" class=\"size-full wp-image-313\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-05.jpg?resize=500%2C644\" alt=\"Ann Todd, Trevor Howard, Claude Rains:  The old triangle stuff.\" width=\"500\" height=\"644\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-05.jpg?w=500 500w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-05.jpg?resize=232%2C300 232w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-313\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Ann Todd, Trevor Howard, Claude Rains: The old triangle stuff.<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>By her own admission, Ann Todd was not much of an actress. \u00a0Unfortunately, this did not prevent her from playing the <em>prima donna<\/em>\u00a0and, as far as Claude Rains was concerned, wasting everybody&#8217;s time on the set. \u00a0Moreover, during the filming of &#8220;The Passionate Friends&#8221; &#8212; a literate, nicely acted romantic triangle picture from 1948 (released in &#8217;49) &#8212; director David Lean began carrying on an affair with her, while he was still married to actress Kay Walsh, and it appears that Todd took wicked advantage of her hold over her director\/lover. \u00a0Lean confessed to Rains, &#8220;Claude, I&#8217;m going to get into awful trouble.&#8221; \u00a0And he did. \u00a0Rains admired Lean enormously as a director (the feeling was mutual), but thought Lean was mad to have taken up with Todd &#8212; a man-eating &#8220;machine,&#8221; as he called her. \u00a0After shooting wrapped, Lean married her in May of 1949. They divorced in 1957. \u00a0Rains was appalled. \u00a0&#8220;By God, she took every cent from him. \u00a0I don&#8217;t think anyone could live happily with that woman. \u00a0She took every damn thing away from him. \u00a0He ended up with nothing but an old car.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Todd was often referred to as &#8220;the pocket Garbo.&#8221; \u00a0That seems about right: \u00a0I&#8217;d add that she could just as reasonably be called &#8220;the pinched Garbo&#8221;: \u00a0except for the rare occasions when she smiled, she always looked as if her shoes were too tight. \u00a0She had a lovely speaking voice and beautiful diction (she studied elocution at the Central School for Speech and Drama in London) &#8212; all very good, as far as it goes. \u00a0But it doesn&#8217;t go far enough.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-06.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-315\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-06.jpg?fit=625%2C495\" alt=\"\" width=\"625\" height=\"495\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">Rains was too much of a professional to let his personal dislike interfere with his performance. \u00a0I rather think his irritation with the actress adds sauce to their onscreen relationship. \u00a0The picture has been almost entirely forgotten, yet it&#8217;s among his best performances (which, admittedly puts it among a large number) and unquestionably the best she ever gave. \u00a0On the surface, his character, Howard Justin, is a standard issue Rains part: \u00a0powerful, unflappable man of the world brought low by a straying woman. \u00a0But I doubt if Rains ever gave a more intensely emotional performance than he gives in this one. \u00a0For much of the picture, Howard Justin could be a stand-in for Alexander Sebastian (&#8220;Notorious&#8221;), Alexander Hollenius (&#8220;Deception&#8221;) or Victor Grandison (&#8220;The Unsuspected&#8221;), but near the end of the picture, things change &#8212; and Rains cuts loose in an emotional torrent that always overwhelms me, no matter how often I see the last reel.<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_311\" style=\"width: 1290px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-311\" class=\"size-full wp-image-311\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg?resize=625%2C781\" alt=\"Rains on the verge of a melt-down.\" width=\"625\" height=\"781\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg?w=1280 1280w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg?resize=240%2C300 240w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg?resize=819%2C1024 819w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-03.jpg?resize=624%2C780 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-311\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Rains on the verge of a melt-down.<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>&#8220;The Passionate Friends&#8221; is based on H.G. Wells&#8217; novel of the same name. \u00a0The screenplay is by a fine espionage novelist, Eric Ambler: \u00a0the Thinking Man&#8217;s Ian Fleming. \u00a0Like Fleming, Ambler often featured a number of recurring characters in his novels, but none of them ever caught on like James Bond &#8212; more&#8217;s the pity: \u00a0Ambler was much the better writer. \u00a0His screenplay for &#8220;The Passionate Friends&#8221; is wonderfully literate. \u00a0In an early flashback scene (surprisingly, &#8220;The Passionate Friends&#8221; has more flashbacks than most film noirs, a genre that practically subsisted on the device), Steven Stratton (Trevor Howard) and his girlfriend Mary (Ann Todd), lie in a meadow and recite from Keats&#8217; &#8220;Endymion&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">All its more ponderous and bulky worth<br \/>\nIs friendship, whence there ever issues forth<br \/>\nA steady splendour; but at the tip-top,<br \/>\nThere hangs by unseen film, an orbed drop<br \/>\nOf light, and that is love:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_309\" style=\"width: 1290px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-309\" class=\"size-full wp-image-309\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg?resize=625%2C496\" alt=\"Todd &amp; Howard:  'Endymion,' anyone?\" width=\"625\" height=\"496\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg?w=1280 1280w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg?resize=300%2C238 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg?resize=1024%2C812 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-01.jpg?resize=624%2C495 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-309\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Todd and Howard: &#8216;Endymion,&#8217; anyone?<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>Mary does not marry Stratton, whom she loves. \u00a0She marries Justin, whom she does not love &#8212; and to make life easier on everybody, she decides never to see Stratton again. \u00a0But this is a love triangle, so their paths needs must cross. \u00a0They run into each other at the New Year&#8217;s Eve party, 1939 &#8212; she with her husband, he with his current girlfriend.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"625\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/SjG3UZNCPRU?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This meeting leads to a more serious rift and again Mary vows to avoid Stratton. \u00a0Nine years pass before their paths cross again. \u00a0In a voice-over, she says: \u00a0&#8220;I suppose that if Fate had been kind and gentle, we would never have met again. \u00a0But Fate is not kind and gentle: \u00a0it sent us together to a sunlit lake and snow-capped mountains and a holiday in Switzerland.&#8221; \u00a0It&#8217;s a fine bit of writing, that; with her beautiful diction, Todd makes it exquisite &#8212; perhaps the one time in her career that Todd actually elevated good material.<\/p>\n<p>In another scene, Mary reads this passage from a book she pulls from a shelf in Stratton&#8217;s flat:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">In the beginning God gave to every people a cup of clay, and from this cup they drank their life.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s from a creation myth of the Digger Indians in California; I find it very beautiful, even though I don&#8217;t believe a word of it. \u00a0This is approximately how I feel about the central conflict of this love triangle story. \u00a0Mary refuses to marry Stratton because she says she doesn&#8217;t want to &#8220;belong&#8221; to anyone, and he responds, &#8220;Then your life will be a failure.&#8221; \u00a0We&#8217;re supposed to agree with him, but I wouldn&#8217;t marry anyone who said anything so caddish. \u00a0On the other hand, she goes off and marries Howard Justin, a man she doesn&#8217;t love, because he&#8217;s rich and offers her security and a kind of life she couldn&#8217;t otherwise afford. \u00a0It seems to me that, since Howard did not win her hand, but <em>purchased<\/em> it, she <em>belongs<\/em> to him, and without the compensation of true love. \u00a0That neither she nor Stratton sees it that way strikes me as a bit thick, especially\u00a0since they&#8217;re given to spouting such lovely poetry at each other. \u00a0But let that go: \u00a0I think it may be accepted as a romance version of Hitchcock&#8217;s McGuffin &#8212; an unimportant, but necessary device to set the machinery in motion. \u00a0Once the engine is running, the rest of the picture clicks along efficiently and by the end, the emotional impact is very impressive indeed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Passionate Friends&#8221; is one of David Lean&#8217;s later black and white pictures; after &#8220;Hobson&#8217;s Choice&#8221; in 1954, he made big Technicolor pictures. \u00a0His pictures always look good, but I prefer his smaller, more intimate black and white features; the cinematography (by Guy Green) in this one is great: \u00a0enough to make it well worth seeing. \u00a0The screenplay and the acting make it a minor classic. \u00a0So why was it not a hit in the United States? \u00a0I&#8217;ve often wondered. \u00a0Perhaps the name change had something to do with it. \u00a0In America, it was retitled &#8220;One Woman&#8217;s Story.&#8221; \u00a0Perhaps even more likely, it was the marketing. \u00a0Have a look at the ludicrous poster for the original release.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_310\" style=\"width: 2010px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-310\" class=\"size-full wp-image-310\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?resize=625%2C489\" alt=\"Does this like a picture you would want to see?\" width=\"625\" height=\"489\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?w=2000 2000w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?resize=300%2C234 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?resize=1024%2C800 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?resize=624%2C487 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?w=1250 1250w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.tr10023.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Passionate-Friends-02.jpg?w=1875 1875w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-310\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Does this like a picture you would want to see?<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<p>When Rains was asked if he could explain the reason for the name change, he replied, &#8220;Apparently, Americans don&#8217;t understand passion.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Notorious Alex Sebastian in \u201cNotorious\u201d (RKO, 1946) is one of Claude Rains\u2019 best parts.\u00a0 As Sebastian, Rains\u2019 performance is so indelible that once you\u2019ve seen it, it\u2019s hard to imagine another actor in the role.\u00a0 After \u201cNotorious,\u201d whenever a picture called for a silky, suave villain, producers would tell the casting agent:\u00a0 \u201cget me a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[306,321,116,334,8,200,328,325,7,293,342,56,324,335,326,69,338,27,322,339,330,250,333,329,126,327,320,323,341,331,340,332,336,337],"class_list":["post-308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-main","tag-adventures-of-robin-hood","tag-alfred-hitcock","tag-all-this-and-heaven-too","tag-ann-todd","tag-bette-davis","tag-cary-grant","tag-cascade","tag-charlotte-vale","tag-claude-rains","tag-clifton-webb","tag-dark-victory","tag-david-lean","tag-dr-jacquith","tag-eric-ambler","tag-gladys-cooper","tag-guy-green","tag-h-g-wells","tag-ilka-chase","tag-ingrid-bergman","tag-irving-rapper","tag-janis-wilson","tag-juarez","tag-kay-walsh","tag-konstantin","tag-max-steiner","tag-mrs-patrick-campbell","tag-notorious","tag-now-voyager","tag-old-acquaintance","tag-olive-higgins-prouty","tag-sol-polito","tag-sylvia-plath","tag-the-passionate-friends","tag-trevor-howard"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p40pmy-4Y","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=308"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8121,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions\/8121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tr10023.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}